Politics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 4

Politics - Essay ExampleS counselinged by the European lines of thought, these parties managed to grow in numbers since they appealed by and large to the oppressed people as well as the distressed workers in the country. They successfully managed to field candidates throughout the nation in numerous elected positions for the succeeding(prenominal) several years. However, towards the beginning of the 1920s, these socialist movements faced severe resistance and condemnation from the government and eventually broke off the movement. The parties ceased to attract numbers to support its bring in the beginning of the early 20th century, though the Socialist Labor Party remained alive until the end of the 20th century.Socialism refers to a system whereby the self-will and control of majority of assets in a given country is granted to the central government. The linked States, unlike other countries such as Japan and Germany, has non employed this system of running the economy. Though t he system has worked very well in the above mentioned countries, the United States continues to thrive well without its enforcement.Politically, socialist parties in the United States began fairing very poorly in the run up to the general elections. For instance, in the year 2008, socialist candidates and their parties received less than two of the three socialist candidates (Caramani pg. 201). This is way below what other socialist candidates in other nations receive. In Germany for example, socialist parties gathered close to 50% of the total votes cast in each attendant election since the 1970s.There are several theories, however, that explain this phenomena in United States politics or governance. The United States has never had a feudal system. Other nations acquit had hierarchical systems which was lead from the top by a supreme deity while at the bottom of the system lay the commoner. Such systems were discriminatory in nature since it gave too much power to the person at t he top at the expense of the common man at the bottom.